Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tributaire de l’histoire et de la politique du bilinguisme, la traduction devient au Canada une discipline universitaire de plein droit dans la décennie 1970. Au départ, la formation des traducteurs occupe le devant de la scène, matérialisée dans la production de manuels. La réflexion sur l’histoire, la théorie et la critique des traductions se développe au tournant des années 1990 parallèlement à la consolidation de la discipline sur la scène internationale. La traductologie canadienne évolue avec le renforcement des composantes théoriques au niveau de la maîtrise et l’ouverture de programmes de troisième cycle. La création de l’Association canadienne de traductologie et deTTR, sa revue, signe l’autonomisation de la discipline. L’analyse des livres publiés entre 1970 et 2017 permet d’identifier les grandes orientations de la recherche et leur évolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.021 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".