MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949580730 · doi:10.1021/cm200994t

Structural, Thermal, and Physical Properties of the Thallium Zirconium Telluride Tl<sub>2</sub>ZrTe<sub>3</sub>

2011· article· en· W2949580730 on OpenAlexaff
Cheriyedath Raj Sankar, Mykhailo Guch, Abdeljalil Assoud, Holger Kleinke

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry of Materials · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomonuclear moleculeTellurideOctahedronZirconiumCrystallographyMaterials scienceInert gasMelting pointThermoelectric effectCrystal structureTelluriumChemistryMoleculeMetallurgyThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have synthesized Tl 2 ZrTe 3 at elevated temperatures starting from the elements. Tl 2 ZrTe 3 adopts a cubic structure, space group P 2 1 3 with a unit cell parameter of a = 19.118(1) Å ( Z = 36). All Tl and Zr atoms are octahedrally (distorted) coordinated by Te atoms. One out of 11 crystallographically distinct Te atoms in the structure is not connected to any Zr atoms, but is surrounded by six Tl atoms in the form of a severely distorted octahedron. Because of the absence of any significant homonuclear interactions, all atoms are in their most common oxidation states, namely, Tl +, Zr 4+, and Te 2– . Electronic structure calculations and physical property measurements reveal the semiconducting characteristics of the compound. The structure and thermoelectric properties of Tl 2 ZrTe 3 and Tl 2 SnTe 3 are compared in the present work. The dimensionless figure of merit, ZT, was found to be 0.18 for Tl 2 ZrTe 3 at 420 K and 0.31 for Tl 2 SnTe 3 at 500 K, with both materials exhibiting very low thermal conductivity. Tl 2 ZrTe 3 decomposes irreversibly around 450 K in open systems under inert gas atmosphere, while it remains stable up to its incongruent melting point at 835 K in closed silica tubes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry of MaterialsSame topicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and DevicesFrench-language works237,207