MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949625461 · doi:10.1002/hep.30256

Oral Abstracts (Abstracts 1–299)

2018· article· en· W2949625461 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHepatology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research CentreErasmus Universitair Medisch Centrum RotterdamSchool of Medicine, Indiana UniversityNovartis PharmaUniversity of California, San FranciscoAllerganMedical Center, University of PittsburghSamsungUniversitätsklinikum KölnTaipei Veterans General HospitalSouthwest HospitalFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoUniversità degli Studi di MessinaLabex Immuno-OncologyNagoya City UniversityPomorski Uniwersytet Medyczny W SzczecinieChina Medical UniversityUniversità degli Studi di TorinoAristotle University of ThessalonikiHospital for Sick ChildrenHouston Methodist Research InstituteFakultet Medicinskih Nauka, Univerziteta U KragujevcuMedizinische Universität WienResearch Committee, Aristotle University of ThessalonikiUniversitat de BarcelonaZhongnan Hospital of Wuhan UniversityUniversité Paris DiderotUniversidade de São PauloUniverza v LjubljaniUniversité Paris DescartesNational Yang-Ming UniversityNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensUniversiti MalayaSeoul National University HospitalMahidol UniversityOchsner HealthUniversité de StrasbourgCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical CenterUniversität WienDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los AngelesCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de BordeauxKaohsiung Medical UniversityCollege of Medicine, University of CincinnatiUniversität BaselEulji UniversityUniversity of ThessalyKing Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research CentreInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleChildren's Hospital Los AngelesUniversity College DublinSingapore General HospitalNational University of SingaporeChina Medical University HospitalUniversity of OxfordSchool of Medicine, Emory UniversityKing's College LondonSungkyunkwan UniversityHallym UniversityNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchSapienza Università di RomaGenomics Research Center, Academia SinicaCatholic University of KoreaIntercept PharmaceuticalsInselspital, Universitätsspital BernInje UniversityChildren's National HospitalUniversity of BernUniversity of PittsburghTeikyo University School of MedicineHanyang UniversityUniversité Paris 13Université de LilleNational Taiwan University HospitalUniversità degli Studi di FirenzePfizerKaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial HospitalWuhan UniversityUniversity of WashingtonUniversità degli Studi di MilanoSeattle Children's Research InstituteNational Taiwan UniversityUniversidad de SevillaNGM BiopharmaceuticalsUniversity of California, San DiegoUniversity of CincinnatiTel Aviv UniversityCystic Fibrosis FoundationKyungpook National UniversityUniversity of New South WalesCleveland ClinicUniversità degli Studi di PalermoHouston Methodist HospitalJohns Hopkins UniversityFaculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle UniversityUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChildren's Healthcare of AtlantaAlexion PharmaceuticalsHuazhong University of Science and TechnologySoutheast UniversitySemmelweis EgyetemSaint Louis UniversityBristol-Myers SquibbHelsingin YliopistoAnkara UniversitesiBaylor UniversityShireUniversité de Reims Champagne-ArdenneIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiPusan National UniversityPalo Alto Medical FoundationEli Lilly and CompanyChildren's Hospital of PittsburghUniversity of AlbertaUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico IIBaylor University Medical CenterArmy Medical UniversityVirginia Commonwealth UniversityUppsala UniversitetRush UniversityFeinberg School of MedicineUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at HoustonYale UniversityTexas Children's HospitalAcademia SinicaEmory UniversityUniversità degli Studi di Roma Tor VergataOhio State UniversityWeill Cornell Medical CollegeUniversity of PennsylvaniaUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical CampusExelixisChildren's Hospital of PhiladelphiaTongji UniversityAlnylam PharmaceuticalsYork UniversityChildren's Hospital ColoradoFaculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityEisaiInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis AvançatsUniversity of Southern CaliforniaGilead SciencesUniversity of RochesterPeking University People's HospitalUniversitair Medisch Centrum GroningenNewcastle UniversityPeking UniversitySeoul National UniversityNorthwestern UniversityAmerican Association for the Study of Liver DiseasesUniversity of TorontoAmerican Porphyria FoundationNational Institutes of HealthChinese University of Hong KongMassachusetts General HospitalÖsterreichischen Akademie der WissenschaftenAssistance publique-Hôpitaux de ParisAudentes TherapeuticsTongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyGlaxoSmithKlineQueen Mary University of London
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Surgeons frequently reject high-risk donor livers, which currently comprise the only increasing and underutilised donor resource. The VITTAL trial assessed "transplantability" of discarded livers with NMP and evaluated 90-day outcomes in these grafts. Methods: This prospective, single-arm phase 2 trial included deceased donor livers, discarded by all UK centres, that met at least one of the following criteria (donor risk index 2.0, macrosteatosis 30%, ALT/AST 1000IU/mL, donor WIT 30mins in DCD livers, poor perfusion or anticipated CIT 12 for DBD or 8hrs for DCD livers. Recipients included consented adults undergoing primary transplantation, with a UKELD score 62, without portal vein thrombosis or significant cardiovascular comorbidity. Livers clearing lactate to 2.5mmol/L within 4 hours of NMP and meeting two other criteria (good arterial/ venous flow, bile production, homogenous perfusion, pH improvement) were deemed transplantable. The primary endpoints were liver salvage success rate and recipient 90day survival. Results: Over 15 months, 185 retrieved livers were discarded for clinical use (Figure Donor inclusion criteria were not met in 25, 21 were offered when the NMP machine was being used, and there were no suitable recipients for 41. Thirty-one livers (14 DCD) were included in the trial. Donor age was 57yrs(30-84), BMI 29kg/ m 2 (20-42), DRI 2.2(1.2-3.8), liver weight 1.8kg(1.2-2.6) and the CIT was 7.33hrs(5:17-14:50) [median (range)]. Of these, 22(71%) livers were transplanted after meeting viability criteria. The total preservation time was 17:53hrs(11:21-25:32). Patient and graft 90-day survival were 100%. Seven (32%) patients developed early allograft dysfunction, and 5(23%) patients developed Clavien-Dindo complication grade 3, including 4(18%) cases with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy. The median intensive care and in-hospital stay were 3 days (2-39) and 10 days (6-47) respectively. Conclusion: Viability testing of discarded livers with NMP is feasible and predicts early post-transplant function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.712

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHepatologySame topicMetabolism and Genetic DisordersFrench-language works237,207