Assessment of the use of mainstream iron addition for phosphorous control on H<sub>2</sub>S content of biogas from anaerobic digestion of sludges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A material flux analysis on sulfur (S), phosphorus (P), aluminum (Al), and iron (Fe) was conducted for two WWTPs (Galt and Kitchener) to evaluate the potential of coagulants that are employed for phosphorus control to reduce hydrogen sulfide (H2S) emissions in the biogas from anaerobic digestion. It was found that while the Galt WWTP receives higher concentrations of S in the raw wastewater than the Kitchener WWTP, this had only a modest impact on the speciation of S entering anaerobic digestion. At both plants, only 2%–4% of influent S entered the digesters. The presence of Fe in the sludge stream was found to cause S, that is released by volatile solid destruction and sulfate ( ) reduction, to become particulate‐bound. A dosage of 1.1 mg/L of Fe into the raw wastewater (11% of the Fe dosed for P control) was sufficient for sulfide (S2‐) control. Transitioning the Galt WWTP from Al to Fe dosing for P control had no significant impact on effluent P concentrations and resulted in a substantial reduction in the biogas H2S concentration. An additional secondary benefit was an increase in the solid content of the dewatered cake. Practitioner points Material flux analyses can be employed to gain insight into the fate of key elements contributing to biogas quality. The use of iron for phosphorous control can effectively control H2S in anaerobic biogas. Conversion from Al2(SO4)3 to FeSO4 dosing for P control resulted in increased solid content of centrifuged biosolids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".