Geometries and Electronic Properties of the Tungsten-Doped Germanium Clusters: WGe<i><sub>n</sub></i> (<i>n</i> = 1−17)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Geometries associated with relative stabilities, energy gaps, and polarities of W-doped germanium clusters have been investigated systematically by using density functional theory. The threshold size for the endohedral coordination and the critical size of W-encapsulated Gen structures emerge as, respectively, n = 8 and n = 12, while the fullerene-like W@Ge(n) clusters appears at n = 14. The evaluated relative stabilities in term of the calculated fragmentation energies reveal that the fullerene-like W@Ge(14) and W@Ge(16) structures as well as the hexagonal prism WGe(12) have enhanced stabilities over their neighboring clusters. Furthermore, the calculated polarities of the W@Ge(n) reveal that the bicapped tetragonal antiprism WGe(10) is a polar molecule while the hexagonal prism WGe(12) is a nonpolar molecule. Moreover, the recorded natural populations show that the charges transfer from the germanium framework to the W atom. Additionally, the WGe(12) cluster with large highest occupied molecular orbital-lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (HOMO-LUMO) gap, large fragmentation energy, and large binding energy is supposed to be suitable as a building block of assembly cluster material. It should be pointed out that the remarkable features of W@Ge(n) clusters above are distinctly different from those of transition metal (TM) doped Ge(n) (TM = Cu and Ni) clusters, indicating that the growth pattern of the TMGe(n) depends on the kind of doped TM impurity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".