Mobilization of Metal(oid) Oxyanions through Circumneutral Mine Waste-Rock Drainage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most studies on the weathering of mine waste rock focus on the generation of acidic drainage with high metal concentrations, whereas metal(loid) release under neutral-rock drainage (NRD) conditions has received limited attention. Here, we present geochemical and mineralogical data from a long-term (>10 years) kinetic testing program with 50 waste-rock field barrels at the polymetallic Antamina mine in Peru. The weathering of most rock lithologies in the field experiments generated circumneutral to alkaline drainage (6 < pH < 9) but with concentrations of the oxyanion-forming metal(loid)s As, Mo, Se, and Sb in the mg/L range. The mobilization of As and Sb was particularly efficient from intrusive, marble and hornfels rocks that contained labile As- and Sb-sulfides, irrespective of bulk elemental content or waste-rock reactivity. High-alkalinity drainage from these materials sustained neutral-pH conditions that are unfavorable to oxyanion adsorption onto Fe-(oxyhydr)oxides and, therefore, enhanced As and Sb leaching. The release of Mo and Se from sulfidic skarn and intrusive waste rock was more proportional to elemental content but equally enhanced by pH-inhibited adsorption and negligible secondary mineral precipitation under NRD conditions. Our results demonstrate that oxyanion concentrations of environmental concern may be conveyed by neutral- to alkaline-pH waste-rock drainage and should be a focus of mine wastewater monitoring programs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".