Conceptual Ideas About the Creative Elite as a Creator of Creative Social Space
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study reveals the idea that the socially multivariant processes of the present cause interest in the creative elite, who are constantly searching for new patterns and landmarks, which can be the basis for the development of all structures of society as a whole.The article discusses the main theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of your elite.It is determined that the existence of various methodologies for the study of the creative elite requires a socio-philosophical view of the architectonics of spiritual production, which also makes it necessary to integrate the theoretical and methodological principles into the conceptual whole of the research.It is revealed that the need is a conceptual understanding of the creative elite, which also serves as the basis for the formation and formation of a special creative social space.It is especially emphasized that it is possible to make up ideas about the creative elite as a special social space on the basis of narrativ as an interdisciplinary methodological construct in the modern social sciences.From the given methodological foundations, the idea of interpreting consciousness as a set of texts, recognizing the possibility of multiple interpretations of each text, and the vision of society and culture as a unity of blurred, decentralized structures in postmodernism are highlighted.The conclusion is that it is possible to consider the creative elite as the bearer of a set of certain social, ethical, psychological, spiritual connections and relationships.The functional characteristics of the representatives of elites are the organizing force that makes any society a coherent sociocultural system.Dynamic creative associations and organizations involve wide public circles in the process of creating new values and actualize their inner potential, from which a new cultural layer is born -a space of positive self-realization of the individual.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".