Conversion Efficiency of Photosynthetically Active Radiation for Soybean Cultivations in Spatial Arrangements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this paper was to assess the efficiency of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) intercepted in dried phytomass of soybean cultivars of determinate and indeterminate growth habits in different spatial arrangements. All experiments were carried out during the 2013/2014 crop year, two soybean cultivars (BMX Ativa RR/determinate and BMX Turbo RR/indeterminate) in a spatial arrangements (45, crossed, 20, 20 × 40, 20 × 60, 20 × 80 cm). Starting from first emergence up to the point of maturation, 14 phytomass assessment were evaluated with seven days interval, in which one plant was sampled per repetition. Greater conversion efficiencies of solar radiation were obtained in paired arrangements. Paired arrangements, and 20 cm, lead to a greater leaf area index, and possibly a greater interception of the diffused radiation and an increase of conversion efficiency and the overall cultivation productivity of BMX Ativa RR and BMX Turbo RR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".