MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949797844 · doi:10.1080/17483107.2019.1626920

Exploring the lived experience of people using ultralight wheelchairs with on-the-fly adjustable seating function

2019· article· en· W2949797844 on OpenAlexafffund
Johanne Mattie, Leo Aitken-Mundhenk, Lauren Bicknell, W. Ben Mortenson, Jaimie Borisoff

Bibliographic record

VenueDisability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of British Columbia HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaGF Strong Rehabilitation CentreBritish Columbia Institute of Technology
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsWheelchairUsabilityPsychosocialPsychologyApplied psychologyManual wheelchairExploratory researchComputer scienceHuman–computer interactionMedicinePhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Manual wheelchairs with spontaneous, user-initiated seating adjustability allow users to independently adjust both rear seat height and backrest angle on-the-fly to optimize positioning for various activities throughout the day.Purpose: This study aimed to examine the lived experience of users of wheelchairs with user-initiated seating adjustability and investigate the impact of this functionality in their day-to-day lives.Methods: This exploratory study involved eight participants who used manual wheelchairs with spontaneous, user-initiated adjustability. Participants engaged in semi-structured qualitative interviews, during which they were asked general open-ended questions about a typical day using their wheelchair, as well as specific questions addressing day-to-day usage, activity participation, and unique seating applications and situations where adjustments were used.Results: Our analysis identified three primary themes: (1) “New Angles on Function and Participation” revealed the impact adjustments had on physical function and participation; (2) “Comfort to Reach New Heights” described experiences related to positioning for comfort, and comments related to convenience and general usability; and (3) “Elevating Health and Social Standing” identified perceived effects of the wheelchair on user health and psychosocial parameters such as social interactions and self-esteem.Conclusions: Our study indicates that adjustable seating can have a significant impact on ultralight wheelchair users. Results may help with prescription of this class of wheelchair, and may also provide potential users and therapists some insight into the range of applications and benefits of on-the-fly adjustment features.Implications for rehabilitationFunctional ability can be improved through the use of on-the-fly adjustable seating functions, leading to heightened participation at home and in the community.Users of wheelchairs with adjustable seating experience psychosocial benefits including increased social interaction and social inclusion.Clinicians and consumers may want to consider the functions that are impacted by adjustable seating as a method of improving reach, transfers, comfort and social interactions of manual wheelchair users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.556

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDisability and Rehabilitation Assistive TechnologySame topicSpinal Cord Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207