Novel Cyclopropylindole Conjugates and Dimers: Synthesis and Anti-Cancer Evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a considerable interest currently in the development of DNA sequence specific or selective agents for genetic targeting for the control of gene expression, for application in diagnosis or ultimately in therapy. In this context CC-1065 is one of the most impressive lead compounds isolated in trace quantities from the culture of Streptomyces zelensis at Upjohn in 1978. The unique structure was confirmed by single X-ray in 1981. However CC-1065 cannot be used in humans because it was found that it caused delayed deaths in experimental animals. In the search for compounds with better antitumor selectivity and DNA sequence specificity many CC-1065 analogs have been synthesized in an attempt to avoid the undesired side effects while retaining its potency against tumor cells. Two successful attempts in the modification in the active moiety of the parent natural product 1,2,8,8a-tetrahydro-7-methylcyclopropa[3,2-e]indole-4-one (CPI) and 1,2,9,9a-tetrahydrocyclopropa[c]benz[e]indole-4-one (CBI) have been made. We review here recent progress with the analogs of CPI and CBI and their conjugates both by solution and solid phase, also the progress and development of CPI and CBI conjugates with polyamides (information reading molecules in the minor groove of DNA). Since CPI-CPI dimers are significantly more potent than CC-1065 in vitro and in vivo, a large number of CBI-CBI dimers with varying linkers lengths and positions synthesized in our group and their pharmacological properties have been reviewed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".