Impact of Miniaturized Fixed-Bias Multineedle Langmuir Probes on CubeSats
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kinetic simulation results are presented to study the response of multineedle Langmuir probes of the type used on many satellites. Simulations of isolated probes are used to parameterize the current collected as a function of voltage for a set of densities and temperatures relevant to the Earth's ionosphere. These simulations also serve to assess the validity of analytic results obtained from the orbital motion limited (OML) theory used in recent studies. Computed probe characteristics are then fitted with empirical scaling laws and used to account for electron current collected by needle probes on a typical triple CubeSat. These fits are then used to determine the impact of the probes and guards on the spacecraft floating potential for a nominal configuration of bias voltages, over the plasma parameters of interest. In order for the probes to work as intended, they must operate at a positive potential with respect to the ambient plasma. However, the results show that for the cases considered, the spacecraft floating potential is so low that the probe with the lowest voltage becomes negative. Possible solutions are examined and proposed to ensure that all probes remain at a positive voltage with respect to surrounding plasma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it