Evaluation of urodynamic pattern in short and long-standing diabetic patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To address the pattern of urodynamic findings in diabetic patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), comparing short-standing and long-standing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: A prospective study was conducted on 50 patients presenting with LUTS and a concurrent diagnosis of T2DM, between February 2016 and May 2018. Patients were classified and evaluated according to the duration of diabetes into two groups: short-standing DM (< 15 years, n = 31), and long-standing DM (≥ 15 years, n = 19) groups. The impact of LUTS and quality of life were assessed in female patients using ICIQ-FLUTS and male patients using ICIQ-MLUTS. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were included in the study. The mean duration of T2DM was 10 ± 0.7 years. The mean age was 56.3 ± 1.2 years, and the mean HbA1c was 7.5 ± 1.2%. Urodynamic evaluation detected significantly higher detrusor overactivity (DO) and increased bladder sensation with the short-standing DM group (35.5 vs. 15.8%, p = 0.01 and 32.3 vs. 5.3%, p = 0.01, respectively). Comparatively, weak, or absent detrusor contractility were more frequent in patients with long-standing DM (52% and 26% respectively p = 0.01). As expected, overflow incontinence and straining during voiding were significantly higher in the long-standing DM group (p = 0.04 and p = 0.03, respectively). Surprisingly, there was no significant correlation between patients presenting with urgency in their voiding diary (subjective) and urodynamic detection of DO (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: There are different patterns in urodynamic characterizations of T2DM. Patients with short-standing DM present more commonly with storage symptoms and detrusor overactivity on urodynamics. Contrastingly, patients with long-standing DM present more frequently with voiding symptoms and detrusor underactivity on urodynamics. Thus, screening for an underactive bladder is advisable in patients with long-standing T2DM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".