CRISPR-Induced Deletion with SaCas9 Restores Dystrophin Expression in Dystrophic Models In Vitro and In Vivo
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a severe hereditary disease affecting 1 in 3,500 boys, mainly results from the deletion of exon(s), leading to a reading frameshift of the DMD gene that abrogates dystrophin protein synthesis. Pairs of sgRNAs for the Cas9 of Staphylococcus aureus were meticulously chosen to restore a normal reading frame and also produce a dystrophin protein with normally phased spectrin-like repeats (SLRs), which is not usually obtained by skipping or by deletion of complete exons. This can, however, be obtained in rare instances where the exon and intron borders of the beginning and the end of the complete deletion (patient deletion plus CRISPR-induced deletion) are at similar positions in the SLR. We used pairs of sgRNAs targeting exons 47 and 58, and a normal reading frame was restored in myoblasts derived from muscle biopsies of 4 DMD patients with different exon deletions. Restoration of the DMD reading frame and restoration of dystrophin expression were also obtained in vivo in the heart of the del52hDMD/mdx. Our results provide a proof of principle that SaCas9 could be used to edit the human DMD gene and could be considered for further development of a therapy for DMD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it