MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950149674 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.023504

Beyond BAO: Improving cosmological constraints from BOSS data with measurement of the void-galaxy cross-correlation

2019· article· en· W2950149674 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Nadathur, Paul M. Carter, Will J. Percival, Hans A. Winther, Julian Bautista

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBrookhaven National LaboratoryScience and Technology Facilities CouncilOffice of ScienceYork UniversityOhio State UniversityUniversity of TokyoUK Space AgencyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity of VirginiaCarnegie Mellon UniversityUniversity of ArizonaSouth East Physics NetworkCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityPrinceton UniversityUniversity of WashingtonAlfred P. Sloan FoundationJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of FloridaHarvard UniversityUniversity of UtahNew York UniversityNational Science FoundationNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthVanderbilt UniversityYale UniversityU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsBossVoid (composites)GalaxyPhysicsAstrophysicsEngineeringMechanical engineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a measurement of the anisotropic void-galaxy cross-correlation function in the CMASS galaxy sample of the BOSS DR12 data release. We perform a joint fit to the data for redshift space distortions (RSD) due to galaxy peculiar velocities and anisotropies due to the Alcock-Paczynski (AP) effect, for the first time using a velocity field reconstruction technique to remove the complicating effects of RSD in the void center positions themselves. Fits to the void-galaxy function give a 1% measurement of the AP parameter combination ${D}_{A}(z)H(z)/c=0.4367\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.0045$ at redshift $z=0.57$, where ${D}_{A}$ is the angular diameter distance and $H$ the Hubble parameter, exceeding the precision obtainable from baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) by a factor of $\ensuremath{\sim}3.5$ and free of systematic errors. From voids alone we also obtain a 10% measure of the growth rate, $f{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{8}(z=0.57)=0.501\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.051$. The parameter degeneracies are orthogonal to those obtained from galaxy clustering. Combining void information with that from BAO and galaxy RSD in the same CMASS sample, we measure ${D}_{A}(0.57)/{r}_{s}=9.383\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.077$ (at 0.8% precision), $H(0.57){r}_{s}=(14.05\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.14){10}^{3}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{kms}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\text{ }{\mathrm{Mpc}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ (1%), and $f{\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{8}=0.453\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.022$ (4.9%), consistent with cosmic microwave background (CMB) measurements from Planck. These represent a factor $\ensuremath{\sim}2$ improvement in precision over previous results through the inclusion of void information. Fitting a flat cosmological constant $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ model to these results in combination with Planck CMB data, we find up to an 11% reduction in uncertainties on ${H}_{0}$ and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Omega}}}_{m}$ compared to use of the corresponding BOSS consensus values. Constraints on extended models with nonflat geometry and a dark energy of state that differs from $w=\ensuremath{-}1$ show an even greater improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations120
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207