MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950176734 · doi:10.82308/9234

The effects of prenatal maternal stress and early life maternal stress on adolescent hippocampal morphology: project ice storm

2018· article· en· W2950176734 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kyle McKee

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubiculumHippocampal formationDistressNeuroimagingBrain morphometryMagnetic resonance imagingPsychologyMedicineInternal medicineClinical psychologyNeuroscienceDentate gyrusRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Prenatal maternal stress (PNMS) is associated with altered hippocampal (HC) structure in animals, and HC-associated psychopathologies in humans. The objective of this study was to determine the extent to which PNMS experienced by women pregnant during the 1998 Quebec ice storm affects HC morphology (volume, surface area and shape) in their children; and to determine the extent to which the effects of maternal stress exposure differ between prenatally exposed children and a matched comparison group of early life exposed children, born 1-year before the storm.Methods: Using a longitudinal design, stress measures (objective hardship, subjective distress and cognitive appraisal) were collected from mothers following the storm, and high-resolution T1-weighted structural magnetic resonance images (MRI) were collected from the children at the age of 111⁄2. Automated neuroimaging techniques were used to derive HC morphology measures. Results: Results show that PNMS exposure, but not early life maternal stress (ELMS) exposure, lead to altered bilateral hippocampal volumes, as well as specific volumetric changes in subfields CA1, subiculum and stratum radiatum/lacunosum-moleculare. The direction of the effects depends on the aspect of the stress assessed. Overall, maternal cognitive appraisal was found to be the strongest predictor of adolescent hippocampal volumes, such that a negative appraisal of the storms consequences predicted smaller hippocampal volumes. A trend was observed for higher objective hardship and subjective distress levels predicting larger HC volumes. Hippocampal surface area and shape appear to be unaffected by either PNMS or ELMS. Discussion: These findings lend support to the idea that PNMS contributes to fetal programming and can exert long-lasting effects on children's brain structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity ResearchFrench-language works237,207