Monitoring and simulating nutrient removal in a constructed wetland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phosphorus contamination of surface waters is a primary water quality concern in the agricultural watershed of Pike River in southern Québec. Surface waters from Walbridge creek, a tributary of the Pike River, were diverted into a small constructed wetland consisting of three basins laid out in series to evaluate nutrient (nitrogen and phosphorus) retention within the system. Hydraulic and nutrient loading rates to the constructed wetland were highly variable in time, with peak rates of loading occurring during runoff events in the watershed, with a mean hydraulic loading rate of 25 cm/day. The wetland retained 8.47 kg total phosphorus, which corresponded to 44 % of total phosphorus inputs (19.3 kg) and it also retained 132.5 kg nitrates, which represented 13 % of nitrate inputs (995 kg) to the wetland, over 4 years (2003-06) of seasonal (May-Nov) operation. Annual mean nutrient retention rates (1.7 g total P m-2 year-1 and 27.3 g NO3- m-2 year-1) were within the range of values reported in the literature for constructed wetlands treating agricultural runoff. This study therefore provided additional evidence supporting the use of small constructed wetlands as nutrient traps in agricultural watersheds in a moderate Canadian climate. A first generation wetland model was also developed using MATLABTM programming language to simulate phosphorus cycling in the wetland. The model was evaluated as a prediction tool of effluent particulate phosphorus and ortho-phosphate concentrations. Much more work needs to be done to improve the accuracy of the model simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".