MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2950341923

The Application of Acoustic Myography in Canine Muscle Function and Performance Testing

2017· preprint· en· W2950341923 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christina Fenger, Adrian P. Harrison

Bibliographic record

VenueviXra · 2017
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGaitElectrical impedance myographyMuscle fibreWork (physics)Physical medicine and rehabilitationAnatomyComputer scienceMedicineSkeletal musclePhysicsInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

begin to walk at a faster pace, the limbs begin to impact with the ground and in so doing behave elastically [5].Clearly, there is then an inverse relation between limb stiffness and an ability to convert potential energy into kinetic energy thus stiffness decreases as speed increases.In the trot, the body's center of mass behaves differently.Rather than being raised in the first half of the stance phase, it is lowered and the body moves as a wave, often with minimal oscillation in those breeds of dogs that are used to trotting for long periods of time [6].Here potential energy is converted into elastic energy and stored upon impact with the ground by passive stretching of tendons and muscles, to be released later on in the stance phase.This is the spring-mass model described by Blickhan [3].The study undertaken by Gregersen and colleagues not only confirms this spring-mass model, it also reveals that the work performed by every joint of the fore-and hind-limbs is more efficient due to a reduced "cost" of physical activity resulting from the release of elastic energy [7].Indeed, in the trot three quarters of the work performed by dogs is recoverable [7].Muscles used in locomotion are stretched prior to shortening while producing a force.Compared to concentric contractions (shortening), eccentric contractions (lengthening) result in the highest force with the lowest energy costs due to the higher energy absorption [7,2].Subsequently, the stored energy can be converted back to kinetic energy in the rebound [1,2].One of the situations in which this is used to great effect is in the very rapid protraction of a horse's fore-limb during periods of galloping, when elastic energy stored in the biceps muscle is released as a burst of energy that results in a catapult action propelling the fore-limb forward [8].Acoustic Myography (AMG), which directly measures muscle contractions, was recently documented as being a useful diagnostic tool for rapidly determining muscular injury in the veterinary clinic [9,10].Indeed, this technique has been used in the assessment of veterinary clinical diagnosis and monitoring of such dysfunctions or diseases as lameness, kissing spine, crookedness and muscular atrophy as well as post surgery/ trauma monitoring (distance measurement) or retraining/ healthy daily training (http://www.myodynamikequine.com/

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueviXra→Same topicVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology→French-language works237,207→