MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Radiative transfer effects during primordial helium recombination

2012· article· en· W2950361003 on OpenAlexaff
Jens Chluba, Jeffrey Fung, Eric R. Switzer

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsRadiative transferHeliumAtomic physicsCosmic microwave backgroundAstrophysicsScatteringSpectral lineIonizationRecombinationResonance (particle physics)AstronomyQuantum mechanicsAnisotropyIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we refine the calculation of primordial helium recombination, accounting for several additional effects that were neglected or treated more approximately in previous studies. These include consideration of the following: (i) time-dependent radiative transfer interaction between the 21P1–11S0 and 23P1–11S0 resonances; (ii) time-dependent radiative transfer for the partially overlapping n1P1–11S0, n1D2–11S0 and n3P1–11S0 series with 3 ≤n≤ 10; (iii) electron scattering within a kernel approach. We also briefly discuss the effect of electron scattering and H i quadrupole lines on the recombination of hydrogen. Although the physics of all considered processes is interesting and subtle, for the standard cosmology, with helium abundance Yp≃ 0.24, the overall correction to the ionization history during helium recombination with respect to the previous implementation of CosmoRec remains smaller than |ΔNe/Ne| ≃ 0.05 per cent. The dominant improvement is caused by consistent inclusion of resonance scattering for the 21P1–11S0 resonance. For cosmologies with a large helium fraction, Yp≃ 0.4, the difference reaches |ΔNe/Ne| ≃ 0.22 per cent at z≃ 1800; however, the overall correction to the cosmic microwave background power spectra is small, exceeding |ΔCl/Cl| ≃ 0.05 per cent only at l≳ 3000. In comparison to the current version of Recfast the difference reaches |ΔCl/Cl| ≃ 0.4 per cent at l≃ 3000 for Yp≃ 0.4, and also for the standard value Yp≃ 0.24 we find differences of |ΔCl/Cl| ≳ 0.1 per cent at l≃ 2500. The new processes are now included by the cosmological recombination code CosmoRec and can be activated as needed for most settings without affecting its runtime significantly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→