MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950366148

Estudio comparativo de la cantidad de informes de responsabilidad social emitidos por las empresas al Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)

2014· article· es· W2950366148 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCOFINHABANA · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAccounting and Financial Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumen En este trabajo se realiza un estudio empirico y exploratorio en la base de datos del Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), con fines comparativos. Es evidente que las empresas europeas y japonesas son lideres en cuanto a la informacion social y medioambiental, asi como Estados Unidos y Canada, que tambien presentan altos indices de revelacion de informacion. Es apreciable el hecho de que las empresas ofrezcan mucha mas informacion de su pais de origen, pero poca o casi ninguna sobre su actuacion en otros paises en los que tienen presencia; esto tiende a justificarse con el argumento de que la cifra de negocios es poco representativa. El caso de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (Mexico) es singular, por la poca presencia de sus empresas en los informes emitidos al GRI. En el trabajo se indican las posibles causas de este fenomeno y se apuntan las iniciativas gubernamentales y no gubernamentales que se llevan a cabo para impulsar esta forma de gestion en las empresas. palabras clave: Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), informe de sustentabilidad, informe social y medioambiental, responsabilidad social corporativa. Abstract In this work we make an empiric and exploratory study on Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) data base. Evidence that Europeans and Japanese’s corporations are pioneers in social and environmental information. North America and Canada have high index of information, less significative and exhaustive than Europe and Japan, there are more than in others Asiatic and Americans countries. Important is how the corporations have much information in their own countries, but not about the others countries where are presence, because the economy in this place is low. And tell us the importance of some sectors. The United States Mexican (Mexico) has a singular situation, first, his economic position, and second, the inexistent presence on the corporate social reports on GRI data bases of Mexican corporations. In this work we explain the possible causes and tell us the governance and no governance initiatives on impel this management area on corporations. keywords: Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), sustainability report, environmental and social report, corporate social responsibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it