MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950444183

Shifts in spatio-temporal fishing behaviour in the Canadian Pacific Halibut hook and line fishery as a result of a choke species

2018· article· en· W2950444183 on OpenAlex
Tiare Georgia Alexandra Boyes

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSkemman · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFisheries and Oceans Canada
KeywordsHalibutChokeFisheryFishingHookLine (geometry)OceanographyEnvironmental scienceFish <Actinopterygii>GeographyBiologyGeologyMathematicsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marine capture fisheries can be characterised by a combination of biological factors governing fish productivity and social factors governing fishers’ behaviours. Most fisheries science research has focused on the biological side of fisheries but few studies have attempted to combine quantitative analysis of fishing data with qualitative study of active fishing participants. Choke species, or species with a low quota allocation in contrast to their encounter rates, may present a particular challenge to management of multispecies fisheries. Choke species may restrict fishers’ ability to harvest other species, especially in the presence of at-sea monitoring, which prevents discarding of regulated species. This thesis combines a quantitative spatio-temporal analysis of the potential impact of a choke species on fishers’ behaviour in the British Columbian Pacific Halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis) fishery with a qualitative analysis of fishers’ reactions to reductions in the quota of bycatch species, Yelloweye Rockfish (Sebastes ruberrimus). Novel criteria were developed and employed to determine if Yelloweye Rockfish acts as a choke species within the Pacific Halibut fishery. Inter-annual and seasonal fishing effort dynamics were studied in years “prior” to (2007-2015) and “post” (2016-2017) a large reduction in the Total Allowable Catch (TAC) for Yelloweye Rockfish. A cluster analysis based on a previous study was developed to identify individual skippers’ “fishing opportunities” (i.e., individual fishing grounds on a fine spatial scale) and track usage of fishing opportunities in “prior” and “post” years. Interviews with five active skippers were conducted to corroborate interpretation of the data analysis. Results indicate that fishers have been successful in reducing their Yelloweye Rockfish catches since the TAC reductions, through a series of avoidance fishing tactics, including shifting into deeper waters, seasonal shifts and the decreased utilization of areas with high proportion of Yelloweye Rockfish in the catch. Studies such as this can help understand the potential spatio-temporal impacts of further TAC reductions for Yelloweye Rockfish. More broadly, this thesis improves understanding of strategies that fishers can employ to comply with catch regulations in monitored multispecies fisheries, which may help improve design of management strategies in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it