The Predicted Structures of the New Pnictides HfMQ in Contrast to ZrMQ (M = Ti, V; Q = P, As)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The new pnictides HfTiP, HfTiAs and HfVAs have been prepared through arc‐melting. These arsenides form the predicted structures with (distorted) TiAs 4 and VAs 4 tetrahedra, while the structures of both Zr analogs (ZrTiAs and ZrVAs) are comprised of TiAs 4 and VAs 4 square planes, respectively. These differences stem from significant differences in the metal atom substructures. On the other hand, HfTiP and ZrTiP are isostructural. These variations were predicted by utilizing a structure map for metal‐rich pnictides and chalcogenides M 2 Q (M = valence‐electron poor transition metal, Q = pnicogen or chalcogen) presented in the year 2000. The HfMQ structure is stabilized by strong Hf−Q, M−Q and M−M bonds, and to a minor extent by Hf−Hf and Hf−M bonding interactions. All three new Hf 1−δ M 1+δ Q phases exhibit significant phase ranges. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2004)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".