MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950749088 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfz106.fp151

FP151SODIUM POLYSTYRENE SULFONATE, PRACTICE PATTERNS AND ASSOCIATED ADVERSE EVENT RISK; A NATIONWIDE ANALYSIS FROM THE SWEDISH RENAL REGISTER

2019· article· en· W2950749088 on OpenAlexaff
Paola Laureati, Marie Evans, Marco Trevisan, Lovisa Schalin, Rino Bellocco, Manish M. Sood, Peter Bárány, Juan Jesús Carrero

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Medical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdverse effectPolystyrene sulfonateRegister (sociolinguistics)Internal medicineEmergency medicineIntensive care medicineMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) is licensed in Sweden for acute hyperkalemia treatment in patients with CKD, but also prescribed off-label for prevention. Despite long-standing clinical use, SPS practice patterns and associated adverse event risk remains unknown. METHODS: Observational study of all nephrologist-referred patients with CKD stage 3-5 initiating SPS in Sweden during 2007-2016. SPS users were 1:2 matched with non-SPS users (controls) and the following dispensation regimes were defined: isolated dispensation and chronic per label (45-60 g SPS/day), occasional (45 g/week) or sporadic (15 g/week) use. Cox proportional hazards evaluated the risk of adverse outcomes within 1 year, including severe (intestinal ischemia, thrombosis or ulceration/perforation) and minor (de novo dispensation of laxatives or anti-diarrheal drugs) gastrointestinal events. RESULTS: A total of 4723 CKD patients initiated SPS in Sweden and 90% of all users had stages 4,5 or underwent hemodialysis. Whereas 40% of SPS users only took one dispensation, 11%, 32% and 17% followed per label, occasional and sporadic chronic regimens, respectively. Compared to 9446 matched controls, SPS users were younger, more often men, with a previous history of hyperkalemia and consuming ACEi/ARBs (P<0.05 for all). During follow-up, 232 severe and 2302 minor gastrointestinal events were recorded. Compared to controls, SPS users did not experience an increased risk of severe adverse events (adjusted HR 1.18; 95% CI 0.89-1.56), but were at 1.24 (1.13-1.36) higher risk of minor gastrointestinal events, mainly accounted by de novo dispensation of laxatives (1.32; 1.20-1.46). Separate dispensation patterns showed similar results to the main analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In advanced/ESKD, SPS is often used chronically and below recommended dosages. SPS use did not associate with the risk of severe GI complications, but was associated with a 30% higher rate of laxative dispensations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicHealth and Medical StudiesFrench-language works237,207