MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950766779 · doi:10.1002/qj.2473

A conservative adaptive wavelet method for the shallow‐water equations on the sphere

2014· article· en· W2950766779 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthias Aechtner, Nicholas Kevlahan, Thomas Dubos

Bibliographic record

VenueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWaveletGridComputer scienceShallow water equationsFloating pointTest caseFortranCode (set theory)AlgorithmApplied mathematicsPoint (geometry)Nonlinear systemComputational scienceMathematical optimizationMathematicsMathematical analysisGeometryArtificial intelligencePhysicsSet (abstract data type)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce an innovative wavelet‐based approach to adjust local grid resolution dynamically to maintain a uniform specified error tolerance. Extending the work of Dubos and Kevlahan, a wavelet multiscale approximation is used to make the Thuburn‐Ringler‐Skamarock‐Klemp (TRiSK) model dynamically adaptive for the rotating shallow‐water equations on the sphere. This article focuses on the challenges encountered when extending the adaptive wavelet method to the sphere and ensuring an efficient parallel implementation using message passing interface (MPI). The wavelet method is implemented in Fortran 95 with an emphasis on computational efficiency and scales well up to processors for load‐unbalanced scenarios and up to at least processors for load‐balanced scenarios. The method is verified using standard smooth test cases and a nonlinear test case proposed by Galewsky et al. The dynamical grid adaption provides compression ratios of up to 50 times in a challenging homogenous turbulence test case. The adaptive code is about three times slower per active grid point than the equivalent non‐adaptive TRiSK code and about four times slower per active grid point than an equivalent spectral code. This computationally efficient adaptive dynamical core could serve as the foundation on which to build a complete climate or weather model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological SocietySame topicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsFrench-language works237,207