MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950771228 · doi:10.1002/hon.42_2629

CRYPTIC <i>MYC</i> AND <i>BCL2</i> REARRANGEMENTS ARE AMONG A RANGE OF GENETIC MECHANISMS UNDERLYING THE DOUBLE HIT SIGNATURE IN NON‐DOUBLE HIT DIFFUSE LARGE B‐CELL LYMPHOMA

2019· article· en· W2950771228 on OpenAlexaff
Laura K. Hilton, Miguel Alcaide, Susanna Ben-Neriah, Aixiang Jiang, Bruno M. Grande, Christopher Rushton, M. Boyle, Barbara Meissner, D W Scott, Ryan D. Morin

Bibliographic record

VenueHematological Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSpinal Cord Injury BCSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyBCL6BreakpointGene rearrangementDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaLocus (genetics)GeneticsPopulationGermlineGeneIndelChromosomal translocationCancer researchSingle-nucleotide polymorphismB cellMedicineGerminal center

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: High-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements (HGBL-DH/TH) has poor outcome after standard therapy. We recently described a gene expression signature (DHITsig) that was characteristic for HGBL-DH/TH with BCL2 rearrangement (Ennishi et al. J Clin Oncol 2019). Interestingly, while this signature identified 27% of GCB diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) as DHITsig positive, only half of these tumors harbored both MYC and BCL2 rearrangements detected by FISH. Here, through whole genome sequencing (WGS), we sought to identify potential mechanisms for expression of DHITsig, including aberrant MYC and BCL2 expression, in non-HGBL-DH/TH-BCL2 tumors. Methods: We performed WGS on 20 DHITsig-pos tumors from Ennishi et al that lack rearrangements of MYC, BCL2, or both. Of these, 18 cases lack a matched normal and were analyzed for somatic SNVs and indels using a combination of Strelka2 and Mutect2, using the GnomAD database to filter germline variants based on population allele fraction. Structural variants and copy number alterations were identified using Manta and Control-FREEC, respectively. Results: Our analysis identified MYC or BCL2 rearrangements that were cryptic to breakapart FISH assays, revealing that 40% of these apparently non-HGBL-DH/TH-BCL2 tumors had, in fact, a “genetic double hit” (Figure 1). These MYC rearrangements involved recurrent non-IG partner loci ZCCHC7, RFTN1, or CD96. Although the breakpoints for two of these translocations were outside of the locus interrogated by FISH, the remainder involved small insertions of either the MYC gene or enhancer regions. Three tumors had focal copy number gains of MYC, including one with a double minute, and six tumors harbored gains of MIR-17-HG, a regulator of MYC expression. Similarly, rearrangements involving BCL2 that were cryptic to breakapart FISH were identified in three tumors, including the insertion of an IGK enhancer element into the BCL2 locus. In the only case lacking both BCL2 and MYC translocations, the 11q alteration associated with MYC-negative high-grade lymphomas was found. Finally, several focal deletions were found affecting the promoter region around TSS1 of the lncRNA PVT1 gene, telomeric of MYC. This locus has recently been found to contain a boundary element that insulates MYC from the actions of downstream enhancers. Keywords: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); gene expression profile (GEP); high-grade B-cell lymphoma with or without rearrangement of MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6. Disclosures: Scott, D: Research Funding: Receives research funds from NanoString Technologies; Other Remuneration: Named inventor on a patent for identifying novel sub-types of DLBCL. Morin, R: Other Remuneration: Named inventor on a patent for identifying novel sub-types of DLBCL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHematological OncologySame topicLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207