Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we present our ic-NBC and ic-DBSCAN algorithms for data clustering with constraints. The algorithms are based on density-based clustering algorithms NBC and DBSCAN but allow users to incorporate background knowledge into the process of clustering by means of instance constraints. The knowledge about anticipated groups can be applied by specifying the so-called must-link and cannot-link relationships between objects or points. These relationships are then incorporated into the clustering process. In the proposed algorithms this is achieved by properly merging resulting clusters and introducing a new notion of deferred points which are temporarily excluded from clustering and assigned to clusters based on their involvement in cannot-link relationships. To examine the algorithms, we have carried out a number of experiments. We used benchmark data sets and tested the efficiency and quality of the results. We have also measured the efficiency of the algorithms against their original versions. The experiments prove that the introduction of instance constraints improves the quality of both algorithms. The efficiency is only insignificantly reduced and is due to extra computation related to the introduced constraints.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it