Synthesis of alkyl 6‐methyl‐4‐(2‐pyridyl)‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydro‐2<i>H</i>‐pyrimidine‐2‐one‐5‐carboxylates for evaluation as calcium channel antagonists
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract magnified image The Bigenelli acid catalyzed condensation of 2‐pyridylcarboxaldehyde ( 1 ), urea ( 2 ) and an alkyl acetoacetate ( 3 ) afforded the respective alkyl (Me, Et, i ‐Pr, i ‐Bu, t ‐Bu) 6‐methyl‐4‐(2‐pyridyl)‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydro‐2 H ‐pyrimidine‐2‐one‐5‐carboxylates ( 4a‐e ). The most potent calcium channel antagonist ethyl 6‐methyl‐4‐(2‐pyridyl)‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydro‐2 H ‐pyrimidine‐2‐one‐5‐carboxylate ( 4b , IC 50 = 1.67 × 10 −5 M) wasa much weaker calcium channel antagonist than the reference drug nifedipine (Adalat®, IC 50 = 1.40 × 10 −8 M) on guinea pig ileal longitudinal smooth muscle (GPILSM). The alkyl 6‐methyl‐4‐(2‐pyridyl)‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydro‐2 H ‐pyrimidine‐2‐one‐5‐carboxylates did not show any inotropic effect on heart since no increase, or decrease, in the contractile force of guinea pig left atrium was observed. These structure activity studies show that the alkyl 6‐methyl‐4‐(2‐pyridyl)‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydro‐2 H ‐pyrimidine‐2‐one‐5‐carboxylates ( 4a‐e ) are partial bioisosteres of nifedipine with respect to calcium channel antagonist activity on guinea pig ileal longitudinal smooth muscle (GPILSM).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it