Polarimetric Variations of Binary Stars. II. Numerical Simulations for Circular and Eccentric Binaries in Mie Scattering Envelopes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Following a previous paper on Thomson scattering, we present numerical simulations of the periodic polarimetric variations produced by a binary star placed at the center of an empty spherical cavity inside a circumbinary ellipsoidal and optically thin envelope made of dust grains. Mie single scattering (on spherical dust grains) is considered, along with pre- and postscattering extinction factors, which produce a time-varying optical depth and affect the morphology of the periodic variations. The orbits are circular or eccentric. The mass ratio (and luminosity ratio) is equal to 1.0. We are interested in the effects that various parameters (grain characteristics, geometry of the envelope, orbital eccentricity, etc.) will have on the average polarization, the amplitude of the polarimetric variations, and the morphology of the variability. We show that the absolute amplitudes of the variations are smaller for Mie scattering than for Thomson scattering, which makes harder the detection of polarimetric variations for binary stars surrounded by dust grains. The average polarization produced depends on the grains' composition and size and on the wavelength of observation. Among the four grain types that we have studied (astronomical silicates, graphite, amorphous carbon, and dirty ice), the highest polarizations are produced by grains with sizes in the range a ∼ 0.1–0.2 μm ( x = 2π a /λ ∼ 1.0–2.0 for λ = 7000 Å). Composition and size also determine if the polarization will be positive or negative. In general, the variations are double periodic (seen twice per orbit). In some cases, because spherical dust grains have an asymmetric scattering function, the polarimetric curves produced show single-periodic variations (seen once per orbit) in addition to the double-periodic ones. A mixture of grains of different sizes does not affect those conclusions. Circumstellar disks produce polarimetric variations of greater amplitude (up to ∼0.3% in our simulations) than circumbinary envelopes (usually ≲0.1%). Other geometries (circumbinary flared disks or prolate envelopes and noncoplanar envelopes) do not present particularly interesting polarimetric characteristics. Another goal of these simulations is to see if the 1978 BME (Brown, McLean, & Emslie) formalism, which uses a Fourier analysis of the polarimetric variations to find the orbital inclination for Thomson-scattering envelopes, can still be used for Mie scattering. We find that this is the case, if the amplitude of the variations is sufficient and the true inclination is i true ≳ 45°. For eccentric orbits, the first-order coefficients of the Fourier fit, instead of second-order ones, can be used to find almost all inclinations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".