Identification of newly-discovered sources belonging to the 4th IBIS\n catalog and to the 54 months Palermo Swift/BAT catalog
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The most recent all-sky surveys performed with the INTEGRAL and SWIFT\nsatellites allowed the detection of more than 1500 sources in hard X-rays above\n20 keV. About one quarter of them has no obvious counterpart at other\nwavelengths and therefore could not be associated with any known class of\nhigh-energy emitting objects. Although cross-correlation with catalogues or\nsurveys at other wavelengths (especially soft X-rays) is of invaluable support\nin pinpointing the putative optical candidates, only accurate optical\nspectroscopy can reveal the true nature of these sources. With the aim of\nidentifying them, we started in 2004 an optical spectroscopy program which uses\ndata from several telescopes worldwide and which proved extremely successful,\nleading to the identification of about 200 INTEGRAL objects and nearly 130\nSwift sources. Here we want to present a summary of this identification work\nand an outlook of our preliminary results on identification of newly-discovered\nsources belonging to the 4th IBIS catalog and to the 54 months Palermo\nSwift/BAT catalog.\n
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it