Anisotropic interactions in a first-order aggregation model: a proof of\n concept
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We extend a well-studied ODE model for collective behaviour by considering\nanisotropic interactions among individuals. Anisotropy is modelled by limited\nsensorial perception of individuals, that depends on their current direction of\nmotion. Consequently, the first-order model becomes implicit, and new\nanalytical issues, such as non-uniqueness and jump discontinuities in\nvelocities, are being raised. We study the well-posedness of the anisotropic\nmodel and discuss its modes of breakdown. To extend solutions beyond breakdown\nwe propose a relaxation system containing a small parameter $\\varepsilon$,\nwhich can be interpreted as a small amount of inertia or response time. We show\nthat the limit $\\varepsilon \\to 0$ can be used as a jump criterion to select\nthe physically correct velocities. In smooth regimes, the convergence of the\nrelaxation system as $\\varepsilon \\to 0$ is guaranteed by a theorem due to\nTikhonov. We illustrate the results with numerical simulations in two\ndimensions.\n
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".