Simultaneous and sequential bilinguals: Cross domain benefits as measured by behaviour and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the present investigation is to explore differences in the bilingual language learning experience based on age of second language acquisition, which fundamentally shapes the way language is represented in the brain and the abilities of the speaker. The question asked here is whether there is a "simultaneous bilingual advantage" when learning a new foreign language due to the attainment of two languages within a highly sensitive period in brain development, and whether there is transfer of any advantage to the music domain. Two groups of bilinguals were compared: 10 simultaneous bilinguals, who learnt both English and French from birth, and 11 sequential bilinguals, who learnt French from birth and English after the age of 7 years. All were highly proficient in both English and French, had no experience in a third language, nor exposure to the languages used in the experiment, and participants had no musical training. Participants were tested on new foreign speech perception and production tasks in Hindi and Farsi and were tested on comparable music perception and production tasks. They also completed a resting-state functional magnetic imaging scan to investigate intrinsic functional brain connectivity networks. Whereas the simultaneous bilinguals significantly outperformed their late-trained counterparts on the foreign speech perception task, the discrimination of the Hindi dental retroflex contrast, the two groups did not differ on the foreign speech production tasks (Hindi and Farsi), or music production tasks, and the sequential bilinguals performed significantly better on a music perception task. The results suggest that the advantage observed behaviorally in the simultaneous compared to the sequential bilinguals is confined to speech perception, and that simultaneous and sequential bilingualism might have different effects on auditory perception abilities as a result of different language acquisition circumstances. In addition, using the behavioural score on the Hindi discrimination task, simultaneous bilinguals who showed better performance on the task also displayed greater brain functional connectivity between the left temporoparietal junction and the right planum temporale, and between right Heschl's gyrus and the left supramarginal gyrus. Both the behavioural and imaging results suggest that linguistic experiences during the first year of life, when brain circuitry is undergoing crucial development, impact language perceptual learning abilities and brain functional organization. Simultaneous acquisition of two languages appears to confer an advantage later in life for perceiving the sounds of a new foreign language. In the larger context, this study adds to the body of knowledge about second language acquisition, its impact on behaviour and the brain, and the findings could have implications for language education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".