MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951118748 · doi:10.1093/jscr/rjz177

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma: a case report and literature review

2019· article· en· W2951118748 on OpenAlex
Simmi Patel, Armand Asarian, Philip Xiao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Surgical Case Reports · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal cell carcinoma treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePapillary renal cell carcinomasClear cellClear cell renal cell carcinomaPathologyTransplantationRenal cell carcinomaCytokeratinChromophobe cellCarcinomaClear cell carcinomaPathologicalInternal medicineImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (CCPRCC), a type of low-grade renal cell neoplasm was recently included in the 2016 WHO classification of renal tumors (Tickoo SK, dePeralta-Venturina Mariza N, Harik LR, Worcester Heath D, Salama ME, Young AN et al. Spectrum of epithelial neoplasms in end-stage renal disease: an experience from 66 tumor bearing kidneys with emphasis on histologic patterns distinct from those in sporadic adult renal neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 30:141–153, 2006). While being recognized as its own entity, there is little research on CCPRCC. The specific tumor comprises of 9.3% of all renal tumors in young adults with an age range of 18-88 years (Wang Y, Ding Y, Wang J, Gu M, Wang Z, Qin C et al. Clinical features and survival of clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma: 10-year retrospective study from two institutions. Oncology letters 16:1010–22, 2018.). In this article we provide recent understanding of CCPRCC and how to identify its distinct pathological entity. It is strongly positive for cytokeratin 7 (CK7), vimentin and mostly negative for CD10 and AMACR (Zhanyong B and John TE Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma in bilateral native kidneys after 2 year of renal transplantation: report of a case and review of literature. Case Reports in Transplantation 2011:11–4, 2011). Histopathologically, all cases of CCPRCC exhibited a tubular and papillary architecture, cuboidal tumor cells with clear cytoplasm and low Fuhrman grade (Wang Y, Ding Y, Wang J, Gu M, Wang Z, Qin C et al. Clinical features and survival of clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma: 10-year retrospective study from two institutions. Oncology letters 16:1010–22, 2018; Kuroda N, Ohe C, Kawakami F, Mikami S, Furuya M, Matsuura K et al. Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma: a review. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 7: 7312–18, 2004.; Srigley JR, Delahunt B, Eble JN, Egevad L, Epstein JI, Grignon D, et al. The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Vancouver Classification of Renal Neoplasia. Am J surg Pathol. 37:1469–89, 2013). This case report and literature review highlights the cryptomorphic, immunohistochemical and cytogenic features of CCPRCC which will assist in understanding and managing these tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it