MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951296485 · doi:10.82308/48812

Cyclic adenosine monophosphate and rho guanine triphosphatase signaling in the guidance of axons to netrin-1

2008· article· en· W2951296485 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Simon W. Moore

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAxon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMultiple Sclerosis SocietyFaculty of Medicine, McGill UniversityMultiple Sclerosis Society of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsNetrinRHOAAxonAxon guidanceCell biologyCyclic adenosine monophosphateGrowth coneBiologyGTPaseSignal transductionNeuroscienceGuanine nucleotide exchange factorReceptorChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The adult nervous system is a network of neurons connected to each other by thin processes, called axons. During development, axons are guided to their targets by patterned chemical cues. The leading tip of an axon, called the growth cone, pulls the axon to its target with cell surface receptors that sense these cues and trigger biochemical cascades which extend, retract or turn the axon. This thesis examines mechanisms involved in the guidance of axons to the cue netrin-1. I test the hypothesis that netrin-1 may function as an adhesive ligand. As well, I examine the role of two signaling pathways, the cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and the rho guanine triphosphatase (Rho GTPase), in the guidance of axons to netrin-1. I report that neurons efficiently attach to netrin-1 and that their growth cones display morphological changes consistent with its function as an adhesive ligand. Inhibition of the RhoA subfamily of Rho GTPases or elevation of cAMP levels increases the plasma membrane presentation of netrin-1's receptor DCC and promotes axon outgrowth and turning to netrin-1. This observation is consistent with the possibility that these two biochemical pathways are linked. However, an important difference exists in how these pathways are regulated by netrin-1; while netrin-1 inhibits RhoA activation, it does not affect cAMP levels. Studies by others have reported that inhibiting RhoA activity or elevating cAMP concentration promotes axon regeneration following injury. These studies did not, however, examine the axon's guidance decisions past the injury site; while overcoming an inhibitory injury site likely involves ignoring or switching the response to inhibitory cues, guidance to their appropriate targets requires axons to sense and respond appropriately to the cues in their environment. Results presented here indicate that inhibiting RhoA or augmenting cAMP levels promote axonal attraction to the netrin-1 guidance cue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicAxon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingFrench-language works237,207