To LP or not to LP? Identifying the Etiology of Pediatric Meningitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction of conjugate vaccines against Haemophilus influenzae type b, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Neisseria meningitidis has led to a substantial reduction in cases of acute bacterial meningitis in countries with high routine childhood immunization coverage. The majority of children hospitalized with meningitis in high-income countries have viral or aseptic meningitis and do not require antibiotic treatment. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis is irreplaceable in appropriately diagnosing and treating bacterial meningitis and avoiding unnecessary antibiotics and prolonged hospitalizations in children with viral meningitis. New diagnostic tests have improved detection of bacterial and viral pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid, underscoring the importance of promptly performing lumbar puncture when meningitis is suspected. This article provides an overview of acute bacterial and viral meningitis in children, focusing on the changing epidemiology, the advantages and limitations of conventional and newer diagnostic methods, and considerations for clinical practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".