MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951481078 · doi:10.82308/1961

Ambivalent Ambitions: The fin-de-siècle Bohemian's Self-Division

2017· article· en· W2951481078 on OpenAlexfundno aff
J. Emyr Macdonald

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsAmbivalencePaintingModernism (music)LiminalityArtEmpireArt historyCompromiseSculptureModern artLiteratureHistoryAestheticsSociologyPerformance artAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis examines the character of the bohemian artist in late-Victorian culture, with special focus on three fictional texts and one non-fictional account: George Moore's A Modern Lover (1883), George Gissing's The Emancipated (1890), George Du Maurier's Trilby (1894), and Arthur Ransome's Bohemia in London (1907). These texts frame countercultural painters and illustrators as possible saviours of modern art at the turn of the century. In each text, bohemian artists take the British art world by storm, infiltrating the bastion of middle-class aesthetics, the Royal Academy. In challenging the establishment's artistic conventions (particularly its preference for classical works) and its commercial marketplace, bohemian characters like Moore's Thompson, Gissing's Mallard, and Du Maurier's Little Billee produce offhand sketches and unfinished or careless paintings, working without working, or making art that remains in a liminal state between complete and incomplete. Their ambivalence towards artistic production reveals their suspension between a reluctance to participate in the commercial art market, and their need to do so to survive. In parallel with this conflict, all four texts end inconclusively, suggesting the potential of an avant-garde movement while remaining wary of its sustainability. Jed Esty's study of bildungsromans, Unseasonable Youth: Modernism, Colonialism, and the Fiction of Development (2012), argues that late-century novels of arrested development compromise the health of the British Empire. In a similar vein, I argue that these four künstlerroman critique the health of English art. My first chapter examines the bohemian collective in Moore's A Modern Lover, showing how this group rises and falls through its novel approach to artistic labour. My second chapter focuses on Gissing's solitary bohemian Mallard in The Emancipated who prizes his hallucinatory dreams over the paintings that he submits for exhibition. In my third chapter, I study Du Maurier's Trilby, analyzing how the on-the-spot illustrations of its protagonist Little Billee skewer bourgeois concepts of creative production. My fourth chapter on Ransome's Bohemia in London explores the bohemian painter's social escapes and the way they both invigorate and doom his artistic practices. A brief conclusion considers my texts in the context of other treatments of nineteenth-century creative labour, such as James Eli Adams' Dandies and Desert Saints (1995) and Andrew Dowling's Manliness and the Male Novelist in Victorian Literature (2001). Despite vital work from Mary Gluck, Elizabeth Wilson and Jerrold Seigel on bohemianism, the fin-de-siècle bohemian in English literature remains understudied, a neglect which this thesis corrects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0190.052
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207