Innovative Solutions for the Control of Leishmaniases: Nanoscale Drug Delivery Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Leishmania are sandfly-transmitted protozoan parasites that harbour within the macrophages of a mammalian host and cause leishmaniasis, a serious zoonotic disease that threatens the lives of millions worldwide. Its numerous forms (cutaneous, mucocutaneous, and visceral) are currently treated with a sparse arsenal of drugs, specifically antimonials, amphotericin B, miltefosine, and paromomycin, for which drug resistance and clinical failure are rampant. Medicine is presently trending towards nanotechnology to aid in the successful delivery of drugs. Vehicles such as lipid-based nanocarriers, polymer-based nanoparticles, and metal ions and oxides have been previously demonstrated to improve bioavailability of drugs and decrease toxicity for the patient. These cutting-edge solutions can be combined with existing active molecules, as well as novel drugs or plant extracts with promising antileishmanial activity. CONCLUSION: This review explores the current evidence for the treatment of leishmaniases using nanoscale drug delivery systems (specifically lipid-, polymer- and metal-based systems) and encourages further development of the aforementioned nanotechnologies for treatment of Leishmania.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".