MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951565188 · doi:10.1177/2054358119854113

Characteristics of Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus by Category of Chronic Kidney Disease and Presence of Cardiovascular Disease in Alberta Canada: A Cross-Sectional Study

2019· article· en· W2951565188 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marcello Tonelli, Natasha Wiebe, Jean‐François Richard, Scott Klarenbach, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsMerck Canada Inc. (Canada)University of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineKidney diseaseDiabetes mellitusAlbuminuriaInternal medicineCross-sectional studyRenal functionType 2 diabetesDiseasePopulationMyocardial infarctionType 2 Diabetes MellitusEnvironmental healthEndocrinologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with an excess risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although CVD, CKD, and use of antihyperglycemic treatments are all key drivers of the costs and consequences experienced by people with diabetes, no recent Canadian data describe these characteristics among adults with diabetes. OBJECTIVE: To describe prevalence of CVD, CKD, and use of antihyperglycemic treatments among adults with diabetes. DESIGN: Retrospective population-based, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Alberta, Canada. PATIENTS: All adults with T2DM as of March 31, 2017. MEASUREMENTS: We described the demographic and clinical characteristics by CKD stage and CVD status and type. CKD stage was categorized according to international guidelines and based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and severity of albuminuria. METHODS: Clinical and demographic characteristics were defined using provincial administrative data; medication use was based on data from the provincial drug plan. Additional analyses examined subgroups based on demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, and medication use. RESULTS: ; 11.1%, 5.6%, and 2.9% had CKD stages 3a, 3b, and 4/5, respectively. The overall prevalence of CVD (prior myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischemic attack, or peripheral artery disease) was 22.5%; prevalence increased in parallel with the presence of CKD: 14.4%, 28.8%, 35.7%, 44.3%, and 50.9% for stages 1, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4/5, respectively. Prescriptions for antihyperglycemic medications were more common in people with CKD as compared with those without. However, the use of all antihyperglycemic medications except insulin and meglitinide was progressively lower in the presence of more severe CKD. LIMITATIONS: The study is based on administrative data; therefore, the findings could be influenced by measurement error (eg, accuracy of diagnostic and procedural codes and prescription drug codes used). CONCLUSIONS: These findings will be useful to policy makers seeking to understand the burden of diabetes-related kidney disease as well as the potential budget implications and potential clinical benefits of expanded use of antihyperglycemic use in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and DiseaseSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207