MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951568138 · doi:10.1109/tps.2019.2918300

MHD Mode Analysis Using the Unevenly Spaced Mirnov Coils in the Keda Torus eXperiment

2019· article· en· W2951568138 on OpenAlexaff
Mingsheng Tan, Hong Li, Cui Tu, Tijian Deng, Zichao Li, Bing Luo, Jinlin Xie, Tao Lan, Adi Liu, Wenzhe Mao, Weixing Ding, G. Zhuang, Wandong Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Plasma Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMagnetohydrodynamicsSidebandPhysicsTokamakTorusPlasmaSingular value decompositionFourier transformMode (computer interface)Computational physicsAlgorithmComputer scienceMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the discrete nature of the saddle coils for the active feedback control of the plasma instabilities, the emergence of the sideband modes is inevitable. In the Keda Torus eXperiment (KTX), the edge Mirnov coils are unevenly distributed on the inner surface of the vacuum vessel to suppress the sideband modes. These arrays of the Mirnov coils are used for the feedback control system of KTX. They are also used for the magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) mode identification, which is a fundamental and significant method to distinguish and describe the plasma instabilities. A set of suitable MHD mode analysis methods has been utilized to complete the mode detection, including the spatial discrete Fourier transform (SDFT) method, the singular value decomposition (SVD) method and the Lomb periodogram method. These methods can obtain comprehensive mode information of the plasma instabilities and their results can be used as the feedback of the feedback control system. These methods have been successfully applied to detect and characterize an impulsive mode of (m = 1, n = 0) and rotating modes of (m = 2, 3, 4, n = 1) in the tokamak plasma of KTX, while the matrix decomposition technique is not applicable for KTX.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Plasma ScienceSame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207