Domestic Violence against Women and Its Effect on Their Children Behavior in Ismailia City
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Domestic violence remains a significant global health problem for women in the current society. Child's exposure to Domestic violence is widely acknowledged as a threat to the psycho-social and academic well-being of children. Aim of the study: to study domestic violence against women and its effect on their children's behavior in Ismailia city. Methodology: Setting: This study was conducted in 4 primary health care centers in Ismailia city. The descriptive study design was utilized to conduct this study. Subject: include 93 married women (15: 49 years), and have at least one child aged 4: 18 years during the field of study. Tools: 1) a structured interview questionnaire covering personal characteristics of women, their husbands, social and economic status of the family, and forms of violence against women in the last 12 months. 2) Child's behavior checklist to measure behavioral and emotional problems of children. Results: The studied women exposed to various types of violence, but the majority of them exposed to psychological or emotional violence and about three-quarter of them visible to physical violence. About three-quarter of their children have behavior problems, but few of the children were on borderline of behavior problems. Conclusion: Domestic violence against women has a negative effect on their children's behavior. Recommendation: Regular meetings with parents to perform an awareness of the effect of witnessing Domestic violence on their children, to teach them how to deal with their children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".