Traditional and Modern Methods of Painting on the Plener of Students of Art Education
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article discusses the concept of plein-air painting as one of the most effective forms of the formation of diversified, creative future artists-educators, where in addition to solving common tasks, there is the possibility of including them in creative activities based on the ability to analyze and synthesize, on a comparison of proportional, constructive, tonal and color relationships in nature.Attention is drawn to the fact that the Odesa School of Fine Arts is characterized by poetic understanding and perception of nature, which influenced the rethinking of the role of etude in teaching and the development of the plein-air teaching method, and the open-air practice of students has become an integral part of the educational process.Theoretical and methodical methods of teaching painting in the open air are revealed and it is emphasized that the problem of developing and educating the creative individuality of artists-teachers in the process of teaching painting and in the open air in the complex of combining traditional and modern methods was not developed enough.It is indicated that in order to combine traditional and modern methods of teaching painting in the open air, it is correct to use the model for evaluating the artistic and creative development of the student's individuality in the learning process, which is a unity of three complementary aspects.It is determined that at the basis of the solution of the tasks set and the positive effect of the proposed methodology there is a combination of all the exercises offered at the practical classes into a complex scientifically based methodological system.It is presented that the conducted pedagogical experiment showed that successful and durable mastering of professional knowledge and the development of practical skills in painting occurs under certain conditions.The conclusion is that the main form of interaction of traditional and modern methods of teaching basic special disciplines is a full-scale production or open-air.The combination of traditional and modern methods of teaching plein-air painting suggests a complex method of correlating learning tasks for painting in the open air with other special disciplines, which makes it possible to trace and define their interaction in order to teach painting in the open air and develop students' creativity.The necessity of a complex mix of traditional and modern methods of teaching painting in the open air, contributing to the formation of the future artist -teacher, is substantiated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".