CARACTERIZAÇÃO CLÍNICA E EPIDEMIOLÓGICA DA MASTITE PUERPERAL EM UMA MATERNIDADE DE REFERÊNCIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivo: analisar o perfil sociodemográfico e epidemiológico da mastite em mulheres internadas em uma maternidade pública no período de 2005 a 2011. Metodologia: estudo descritivo, documental e retrospectivo com abordagem quantitativa, abrangendo todos os casos de mulheres com mastite de 2005 a 2011 em uma maternidade de referência no Piauí. Resultados: as mulheres, em sua maioria, eram adolescentes e adultas jovens (61,5%), solteiras (36,4%), oriundas da capital (61,5%), com ensino fundamental completo (34,6%) e do lar (36,5%). Todas fizeram uso de antibioticoterapia, a maioria não apresentou recidiva (94,2%) e a principal complicação clínica foi o ingurgitamento mamário (67,3%). Conclusão: trata-se de uma patologia frequente que interfere significativamente no sucesso ou não da amamentação, tornando-se imperativo uma assistência de enfermagem com ênfase na educação em saúde por meio de orientações sobre boas técnicas de amamentação e prevenção da mastite.Descritores: Aleitamento Materno, Período Pós-Parto, Saúde da Mulher, Enfermagem.CLINICAL AND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF PUERPERAL MASTITIS IN A REFERENCE MATERNITYObjective: to analyze the sociodemographic and epidemiological profile of mastitis in women hospitalized in a public maternity hospital from 2005 to 2011. Methodology: descriptive, documental and retrospective study with a quantitative approach, covering all cases of women with mastitis from 2005 to 2011 in Reference Maternity in Piauí. Results: most of women were teenagers and young adults (61.5%), single (36.4%), from the capital city (61.5%), with complete elementary education (34.6%), and housewives (36.5%). They all used antibiotic therapy. The majority did not present recurrence (94.2%), and the main clinical complication was breast engorgement (67.3%). Conclusion: mastitis is a frequent pathology that significantly interferes with the success or failure in breastfeeding. Nursing assistance with an emphasis on health education through guidelines on good breastfeeding techniques and prevention of mastitis becomes imperative.Descriptors: Breastfeeding, Postpartum Period, Women’s health, Nursing.CARACTERIZACIÓN CLÍNICA Y EPIDEMIOLÓGICA DE LA MASTITE PUERPERAL EN UNA MATERNIDAD DE REFERENCIAObjetivo: analizar el perfil sociodemográfico y epidemiológico de la mastitis en mujeres ingresadas en una maternidad publica en el periodo de 2005 a 2011. Metodología: estudio descriptivo, documental y retrospectivo con abordaje cuantitativo, que abarca todos los casos de mujeres con mastitis de 2005 hasta 2011 en maternidad de referencia en el Piauí. Resultados: las mujeres, en su mayoría, eran adolescentes y adultas jóvenes (61,5%), solteras (36,4%), oriundas de la capital (61,5%), con educación fundamental completa (34,6%) y que eran dueñas de casa (36,5%). Todas hicieron terapia con antibióticos, la mayoría no presentó recidiva (94,2%) y la principal complicación clínica fue la congestión mamaria (67,3%). Conclusión: se trata de una patología frecuente y que interfiere significativamente en el suceso o no de la lactancia materna, se vuelve imperativo una asistencia de enfermería con enfoque en la educación en salud por medio de orientaciones sobre buenas técnicas de lactancia materna y prevención de la mastitis.Descriptores: Lactancia Materna, Periodo Posparto, Salud de la Mujer, Enfermería.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".