MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951819316 · doi:10.1111/jocn.14959

Factors influencing the practice of new graduate nurses: A focused ethnography of acute care settings

2019· article· en· W2951819316 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Martin Charette, Johanne Goudreau, Anne Bourbonnais

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Nursing · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing education and management
Canadian institutionsInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de MontréalUniversité de Montréal
FundersMinistère de l'Enseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche Scientifique et de la Formation des CadresUniversité de MontréalInstitute of Health Services and Policy ResearchInstitut des Sciences Mathématiques, Université du Québec à MontréalMinistère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique
KeywordsNursingNurse educationNursing researchWorkloadNonprobability samplingDocumentationContext (archaeology)Health careFocus groupPsychologyMedicineMedical educationSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM: To explore the influence of an acute care setting on competency deployment of new graduate nurses (NGNs) from a competency-based undergraduate programme. BACKGROUND: In the last 15 years, nursing education has shifted to competency-based education (CBE). Few studies have focused on how NGNs from these reformed programmes use the competencies they have developed. To be paradigmatically coherent with the nature of a competence, studies should also examine how context influences nursing practice and competency deployment. DESIGN: A focused ethnography of three acute care units from one academic hospital in Canada. METHODS: Purposive and snowball sampling strategies were used to recruit 19 participants: NGNs (n = 4), nurse preceptors (n = 2), clinical nurse specialists (n = 9) and nurse managers (n = 4). Data were collected through individual interviews, focus groups, observation and documentation. Data were analysed according to Roper and Shapira (Ethnography in nursing research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2000) ethnographic nursing analysis framework. RESULTS: Organisational and individual factors were identified as influencing NGNs' competency deployment. Organisational factors are orientation, stability, workload and the scientific culture of the unit. Personal factors have been linked to groups of professionals: for NGNs, personality and clinical placements during their initial education; for nurses working with NGNs, to be role models, to promote integration and to denounce bullying; and for other health professionals, to recognise nursing expertise. CONCLUSION: One way to smooth the transition from academic to clinical settings for NGNs is by offering transition or orientation programmes that will provide them with stability and a reduced workload, allowing them to progressively deploy their competencies. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Organisational and individual factors influence how new graduate nurses deploy their competencies. Clinical educators and nurse managers can help new nurses by acting on these factors. This study conforms to the COREQ Research Reporting Guidelines for qualitative studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical NursingSame topicNursing education and managementFrench-language works237,207