A Density Functional Study of the Various Forms of UN<sub>4</sub>O<sub>12</sub>Containing Uranyl Nitrate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we report the computational results of a density functional study of 73 UN4O12 isomers containing uranyl nitrate, UO2(NO3)2, as a component. The isomers are grouped into three categories and 19 types. Forty-four isomers of 14 types are dinitrogen tetroxide adducts of uranyl nitrate, UO2(NO3)2.N2O4, 22 are nitrosonium salt adducts of uranyl nitrate, NO+UO2(NO3)3-, NO+UO2(NO3)2O(NO2)-, NO+UO2(NO3)2(ONOO)-, or (NO+)2UO2(NO3)2O22-, and 7 are bis(nitrogen dioxide) adducts of uranyl nitrate, UO2(NO3)2.2NO2. The 22 most stable isomers in solution, representing the 20 most stable gas-phase isomers, were selected for analysis. Of these selected structures only two categories and six types were represented. Structures, frequencies, gas-phase and solution energetics, atomic charges, dipole moments, and the bonding within the N2O4 unit and between NO+ and UO2(NO3)3- components have been analyzed in detail. On the basis of relative Gibbs free energy calculations five isomers (the N2O4 adducts a1, a2, and a3 and the nitrosonium salts b1 and b2) were identified as strong candidates to exist and possibly predominate in the gas phase, with a1 and a2 being the strongest candidates. Similarly, four isomers (a6, a5, a8, and a1, all of them N2O4 adducts) were identified as strong candidates to exist and possibly predominate in a nonaqueous solution of nitromethane/dinitrogen tetroxide. Of these, a6 was determined to be the most likely candidate to predominate in solution. The possibility of dissociation in solution has been addressed briefly. In addition, computational evidence for the existence of four new N2O4 isomers 20, 22, 27, and 28 in both the gas and the solution phases is presented for the first time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".