MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951846953 · doi:10.82308/46877

Structure-function analysis of RNA editing ligases and their interacting protein partners in the editosome complex of «Trypanosoma brucei»

2010· article· en· W2951846953 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Rajashree Sen

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrypanosoma species research and implications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsTrypanosoma bruceiRNA editingDNA ligaseBiologyUbiquitin ligaseRNARNA ligaseMolecular biologyGuide RNAGeneticsCell biologyUbiquitinDNAGeneGenomeGenome editing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trypanosoma brucei is a parasite that causes the vector-borne disease African sleeping sickness. The mitochondrial mRNAs of T. brucei undergo post-transcriptional RNA editing to make mature, functional mRNAs. The final step of this process is catalyzed by the essential ligase, Kinetoplastid RNA Editing Ligase 1(KREL1) and closely related KREL2. This study is an in vitro characterization of interaction of KREL1 and KREL2 with binding partners KREPA2 and KREPA1, respectively, using full-length, truncated and point-mutated ligases. We have shown a strong, specific stimulatory effect of the interacting partners on catalytic activity of the ligases. We have narrowed the region of contact to fifty-nine C-terminal residues for KREL1 and forty-five for KREL2. Finally we have identified the N-terminal residues F206, T264 and Y275 and C-terminal K405 on KREL1 as critical for catalytic activity as well as interaction with KREPA2. K424 and the KWKE (441-444) stretch possibly co-ordinate KREPA2 interaction during adenylylation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicTrypanosoma species research and implicationsFrench-language works237,207