Zr<sub>11</sub>Sb<sub>18</sub>: A New Binary Antimonide Exhibiting an Unusual Sb Atom Network with Nonclassical Sb−Sb Bonding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The herewith-introduced antimonides Zr(11)Sb(18) and Zr(10.4)V(0.6)Sb(18) were prepared by high-temperature techniques; both arc-melting and solid-state reactions at 1200 degrees C starting from alpha-ZrSb(2) and the metals Zr and V in powder form are possible methods. These isostructural compounds represent an unprecedented metal:antimony ratio of 11:18 and form a new structure type. Zr(11)Sb(18) crystallizes in the tetragonal space group I(-)42d, with the lattice dimensions a = 676.94(4) pm and c = 6007.3(5) pm, while the V-containing phase forms a slightly smaller unit cell with a = 676.48(8) pm and c = 6005.6(9) pm (Z = 4). Their structures are comprised of an Sb atom substructure with several intermediate Sb-Sb bonds starting at 311 pm, which is reminiscent of that found in the series (Ti,M)(5)Sb(8) (M = Zr, Hf, Nb, Mo) published last year. Interwoven with this network is the Zr atom network, which forms a diamond-like metal atom substructure with long Zr-Zr contacts of ca. 360 pm. Band structure calculations based on the linear muffin tin orbital approach reveal these antimonides to be mainly stabilized by strong M-Sb and intermediate Sb-Sb bonds, and additionally--to the smallest extent--by M-M bonds (M = Zr, V). In agreement with the electronic structure calculations, Zr(11)Sb(18) is metallic with a small positive Seebeck coefficient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".