MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952002158 · doi:10.1109/tap.2019.2923074

Dual-Band Microstrip Corporate Feed Network Using an Embedded Metamaterial-Based EBG

2019· article· en· W2952002158 on OpenAlexafffund
Jacob A. Brown, Stuart Barth, Braden P. Smyth, Ashwin K. Iyer

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsMetamaterialMetamaterial antennaMulti-band deviceMaterials scienceMicrostripBandwidth (computing)TransformerOptoelectronicsPower dividers and directional couplersElectrical lengthMicrostrip antennaReturn lossInsertion lossWilkinson power dividerComputer scienceElectrical engineeringOpticsTelecommunicationsPhysicsVoltageAntenna (radio)EngineeringSlot antenna

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper demonstrates the design and experimental validation of a dual-band microstrip (MS) corporate feed network using an embedded metamaterial-based electromagnetic bandgap (MTM-EBG) structure. The MTM-EBG is designed to appear as a 35.4 Ω MS transmission line (TL) with a 90° electrical length at both 2.4 and 5.0 GHz. This structure is then used in place of a conventional single-band quarter-wavelength transformer in a 50 Ω MS T-junction power divider, rendering it dual band with 10 dB return-loss fractional bandwidths of 82.3% and 12.0% at center frequencies of 2.4 and 5.0 GHz, respectively. The result of this modification shows a very good performance at both operating frequencies, as well as substantial rejection over a prescribed bandwidth of intermediate frequencies. The dualband transformer formed by the embedded MTM-EBG is 30.5% miniaturized at 2.4 GHz relative to a conventional MS quarterwavelength transformer, which indicates its potential for use in size-restricted scenarios and embedded filtering applications. A dual-band four-way corporate feed network is then formed by cascading the MTM-EBG-loaded T-junction power dividers, which is suitable for antenna array applications. This structure has an improved performance at 2.4 and 5.0 GHz compared to unloaded networks designed for these frequencies having the same overall size. The experimental 10 dB fractional bandwidth for the MTM-EBG-loaded corporate feed network was found to be 52.0% and 10.8% around 2.4 and 5.0 GHz, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score0.867

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207