A Space to Call Our Own: The U’Mista Cultural Centre as a Representative of First Nations Collective Agency and its associated health benefits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis examines the social and political relationship between Canadian indigenous communities and the Federal government regarding issues of cultural representation, the ownership of cultural artefacts, and institutional representation. It surveys at the correlation between the broader issues of sociocultural sovereignty and health outcomes within indigenous communities and their members. Furthermore, the thesis explores trends in cultural survival such as the development of native-led cultural institutions that foster the continuation of cultural praxis through the tropes of Social Context theory and Social Cognitive theory, borrowed from the discipline of psychology. The theories demonstrate how the history of colonialisation, European settlement, and the implementation of Western laws and property rights have led to multigenerational disruptions in the sharing of cultural information and persistent psychological trauma. These theories are utilised in order to demonstrate how institutional jurisdiction over cultural objects, the usurpation native lands, and control over the prevailing historical narratives of indigenous histories within public institutions has adversely affected the physical, spiritual, and health levels of indigenous populations and how Native-led cultural centres may serve as a mediating factor. These evaluations are supported by an analysis of statistics from Canadian state institutions such as Health Canada and studies such as the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Health. The thesis contends that social movements in the 20th Century irrevocably altered the established relationships between the established systems of governance within settler colonies, allowing for enhanced indigenous cultural sovereignty and the establishment of alternative cultural spaces that address the culturally specific needs of respective native groups. The Kwakwaka’wakw Nation of British Columbia and their cultural centre, the U’Mista Cultural Centre, is an exemplary illustration of indigenous-led cultural continuity (or ethnic renewal) and the intergenerational transfer of cultural lifeways. Furthermore, the various ways in which indigenous populations have been depicted by Euro-Canadian museums and ethnographic museums is examined. Comparisons between native-led cultural centres and the historical role of traditional institutions are considered and methods on how to incorporate of indigenous norms that nurture representational justice and the inclusion of alternative perspectives in the ethnographic scholarship. The permanence of traditional museums on the cultural landscape places a critical emphasis on partnerships with native-led institutions, which often lack access to financial resources and large population centres in order to address the needs of off-reserve populations and change the perception of First Nations peoples amongst the general Canadian population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".