MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952079285 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.math/0610044

KK-theoretic duality for proper twisted actions

2006· preprint· en· W2952079285 on OpenAlexaff
Siegfried Echterhoff, Heath Emerson, Hyun Jeong Kim

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2006
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsPoincaré dualityDuality (order theory)ConjectureManifold (fluid mechanics)Group (periodic table)Riemannian manifoldDirac (video compression format)Section (typography)CombinatoricsPure mathematicsInverseMathematical physicsPhysicsCohomologyGeometryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let the discrete group G act properly and isometrically on the Riemannian manifold X. Let C_0(X, δ) be the section algebra of a smooth locally trivial G-equivariant bundle of elementary C*-algebras representing an element δof the Brauer group Br_G(X). Then C_0(X,δ^{-1}) x G is KK-theoretically Poincare dual to (C_0(X,δ)\otimes_{C_0(X)} C_τ(X)) xG, where δ^{-1} is the inverse of δin the Brauer group. We deduce this from a strengthening of Kasparov's duality theorem RKK^G(X; A,B) \cong KK^G(C_τ(X)\otimes A, B). As applications we also obtain a version of the above Poincare duality with X replaced by a compact G-manifold M and for twisted group algebras C*(G,ω) if G satisfies some additional properties related to the Dirac-dual Dirac method for the Baum-Connes conjecture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.269
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.031 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAdvanced Operator Algebra ResearchFrench-language works237,207