MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952087291 · doi:10.5560/znb.2014-3335

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of Pd<sub>5</sub>InSe

2014· article· en· W2952087291 on OpenAlexfundno aff
André Götze, Philipp Urban, Oliver Oeckler, Holger Kohlmann

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Naturforschung B · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic Chemistry and Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHarvard Graduate School of EducationDalhousie UniversityDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsCrystallographyStoichiometryCrystal structureSingle crystalCrystal (programming language)DiffractionMaterials scienceStructure typeType (biology)Space groupPowder diffractionPalladiumChemistryX-ray crystallographyPhysicsCatalysisPhysical chemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pd5InSe has been prepared from the elements. The use of iodine as a mineralizing agent enables the synthesis of single-phase powder samples as well as of single crystals. Pd5InSe is stable in cold air, but reacts to give Pd, In2O3 and Pd4Se at 400 °C. The crystal structure of Pd5InSe was determined from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data (space group P4=mmm, a = 4.0255(7), c = 6.972(1) Å, z(Pd2) = 0.28111(8)) and belongs to the Pd5TlAs-type structure with full occupation of all atomic sites. EDX analysis on the single crystal (Pd5.0(1)In0.99(3)Se1.0(1)) confirms the stoichiometric composition. The relationship to the cubic close packing (Cu-type structure), which may be visualized by the crystal chemical formula Pd4PdTlAs⃞, is proven by a Bärnighausen symmetry tree.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für Naturforschung BSame topicInorganic Chemistry and MaterialsFrench-language works237,207