MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952242691 · doi:10.1029/2018jc014697

Heat and Freshwater Transport by Mesoscale Eddies in the Southern Subpolar North Atlantic

2019· article· en· W2952242691 on OpenAlexaffabout
Vasco Müller, Dagmar Kieke, Paul G. Myers, Clark Pennelly, Reiner Steinfeldt, Ilaria Stendardo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Oceans · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsEddyOcean gyreBoundary currentOceanographyGeologyClimatologyWater massMesoscale meteorologyThermohaline circulationSubtropicsLatitudeGulf StreamOcean currentGeographyMeteorologyTurbulenceGeodesyFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new data set of temperature and salinity fields reconstructed from satellite altimetry data between January 1993 and April 2014 is combined with satellite observations of mesoscale eddies in the subpolar North Atlantic between 40°N–55°N and 43°W–20.5°W. The data set is used to calculate the meridional heat and freshwater transports related to the propagation of eddies crossing 47°N, a latitude close to the boundary between the subpolar and the subtropical gyres. The largest heat and freshwater transports by eddies are observed in the western part of the Newfoundland Basin. Around 35–45% of the heat and freshwater transports by eddies across 47°N stem from individual isolated eddies with large thermohaline signatures. Northward moving cold and fresh cyclonic eddies carrying subpolar water from the Western Boundary Current make a considerable contribution to the overall heat and freshwater transport by eddies crossing 47°N. While the transport by individual eddies is negligible compared to the transport by the mean flow in this region, it can have a notable influence on the temporal variability. The analysis is repeated for a model simulation with 1/12° horizontal resolution for the period 2002–2013. The observed results are well reproduced in the model simulation; in particular, the modeled number of eddies crossing 47°N, the spatial distribution, and the associated heat and freshwater transports across this latitude are consistent with the observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research OceansSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207