Sagittal Balance in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Managed With Intraoperative Skull Femoral Traction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort, single-center quality improvement study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of the intraoperative skull femoral traction (IOSFT) on sagittal balance in posterior spinal instrumentation (PSI) to manage scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: IOSFT has been used routinely as an adjunct technique for facilitating PSI to manage scoliosis in our institution since 2010. Previous studies have raised concerns regarding the negative effect of IOSFT on lumbar lordosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records and radiographs of 113 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis managed with single stage PSI were reviewed. Eighty-five patients were operated with IOSFT (traction group) and 28 patients were operated without traction (nontraction group). Patients who had double (anterior-posterior) approaches or nonidiopathic scoliosis were excluded. Sagittal balance and pelvic parameters at 2 years of postoperative follow-up were the primary outcome measures. Statistical analysis was done with R for statistical computing. Median values and interquartile range were compared between groups using Wilcoxon rank sum, Fischer exact, and Welch t tests. P-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: No significant differences were found comparing postoperative lumbar lordosis in the nontraction group (54 degrees) with the traction group (53 degrees) (P=0.4953). No significant differences were found in postoperative sagittal vertical axis medians comparing both groups, with 17 mm in the nontraction group and 18 mm in the traction group (P=0.3994). No significant differences were found in postoperative pelvic parameters. The median pelvic incidence was 52 degrees in the nontraction group and 50 degrees in the traction group (P=0.2711). CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, the use of IOSFT as an adjunct to facilitate PSI for managing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis had no measurable negative impact on sagittal balance in our IOSFT cohort.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".